AVIF is newer than WebP by about a decade, which means its compatibility gap with non-browser software is significantly wider. Chrome added AVIF support in 2020, Firefox in 2021, Safari in 2022. Outside browsers, the format is still largely unknown to the systems people actually need to submit images to. Most desktop image viewers, print kiosks, corporate HR platforms, and government portal upload handlers were built before AVIF existed and have never been updated to recognize it. From their perspective, an AVIF file is simply an unrecognized format that gets rejected at the validation step.
The tricky part is how AVIF files arrive on people's devices without them choosing the format. Android devices running recent versions of the operating system can save camera photos as AVIF by default, depending on the manufacturer and settings. AI image generators including Midjourney, Stable Diffusion interfaces, and some DALL-E wrappers export outputs as AVIF because it produces the smallest files for the image quality. Screenshot tools on some platforms default to AVIF. And downloading images from websites is the same problem as with WebP: the browser saves whatever format the site serves, and modern sites increasingly serve AVIF to supported browsers. You end up with an AVIF file you didn't ask for and a portal that won't take it.
The file size increase from AVIF to JPEG and how to manage it
AVIF has better compression than JPEG, sometimes significantly better, which means going from AVIF to JPEG always produces a larger file at equivalent quality. The degree varies by image type. For photographs with complex detail, a 100KB AVIF might become 250 to 400KB as JPEG at quality 85. For simpler images with flat areas and limited color variation, the gap is smaller. This size increase matters most when the JPEG needs to pass a portal's file size limit. If you're converting for a system that requires images under 100KB, the converted JPEG at quality 85 might not pass even if the original AVIF was well under the limit. Dropping quality to 75 or 80 usually brings the JPEG back down while keeping the output acceptable for a profile photo or document attachment. If you still need more reduction, the compress under 100KB tool can target any specific size as a second step.
When to convert to PNG instead of JPEG
JPEG is the right output for almost every portal and form submission because it's accepted without question everywhere. There are two cases where PNG makes more sense. The first is when the AVIF has a transparent background, such as a logo or product cutout exported from a design tool. JPEG has no alpha channel, so transparent pixels become white, which breaks the asset for anything other than a white background. The second is when the image will go through further editing before its final use. PNG's lossless encoding means no additional compression artifacts get introduced each time it's saved during the editing process. For either of those situations the AVIF to PNG converter handles the conversion with full alpha channel preservation. For everything else where you just need the file to open and upload without being rejected, JPEG is the straightforward answer.